View Full Version : pros and conso of highmounts vs lowmount exhausts
04-17-2006, 02:06 PM
I didn't get any hits on the other thread, so I thought I would redo the title. I'm very close to getting an exhaust but I'm still torn between high or low mounts. Asthetically, I like the high mounts: makes the bike's profile sleeker, etc. Seems I've only seen the low mounts. Any reason for this? Any help with my $1000 triggerpulling painful decision would help out.
04-17-2006, 03:09 PM
Get high mounts for sure. They look bad ass! Only thing is you have to delete your rear passenger pegs. Look at Arrow!
04-17-2006, 03:15 PM
The Leo Vince highmounts keeps the passenger pegs. To be honest, I have only ridden two-up once, and that was to bring a friend to the moto shop to pick up his bike. I don't care about rears, really. Are the Arrows street legal? I ride in Malibu sometimes and the cops will hit you with a ticket for aftermarket pipes. San Diego is not bad at all plus the Harleys take the heat off the sportbikers. Arrows were on my short list. I will go to their site again. I have not seen a picture of a 2007 Tuono with the Arrows. Send one if you have one.
04-17-2006, 03:27 PM
pics of arrow, i can't find high mount
for more pictures look here
04-17-2006, 05:57 PM
I sent Arrow an email if they have high-mounts. I don't think I have ever gotten an email back from a manufacturer.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.